the system in place now works - in theory. if judges were harsh on manipulation of the system; excessive backloading for a higher technical score (and still receiving high composition marks), looking at only the height and landing flow of a jump and giving it a +2 or a +3 even though it doesnt satisfy six of the bullet points, tanos and rippons being used flippantly to ramp up the goe at the sake of making the jump smaller and more laboured and therefore satisfying less of the bullet points for goe in actuality, there are plenty of other things that come to mind too, lol. if these things were actually penalised, and pcs was judged properly and not just given by reputation and technical ability of the skater, then there wouldn't have been a call for change in the way that programs are scored.