MaxSWAGG

I personally think it's too dangerous! I think it may be next season at the earliest.

Well, half of me is pissed. Though both of these are by far my favorite programs of his, repeating them both (especially if there is no 4Lz)?? I understand it...but at the same time don't. Mostly disappointed because I'm just thinking of what a new program could have been.

Kurt. He left a legacy. Even if he doesn't have an Olympic medal.

Since in most cases, it's not a "one-hit-wonder," World gold is superior to Olympic bronze and silver. If you're a one-hit-wonder, no one will care or remember if you got Olympic bronze or silver anyway.

In no particular order: Notte Stellata Seimei Chopin 1.0 Hana ni Nare The Final Time Traveler: this one

I'm afraid Prokofiev is too heavy. I think the lighter instrumental pieces fit his skating better. But I'd like to hear Prokofiev suggestions also!

It's okay if you don't know the Levels. We likely won't be changing the already-called levels.

This would be interesting also, to see how a "layman" would score!

Bringing this over from the general thread, I'm asking to see who is interested in starting a mock judging panel. We would choose an event (possibly do a poll to see what everyone wants to see) and, well, judge it. We would just give GOEs and component scores, unless there is disagreement with among us about the technical calls that were actually made. The panel doesn't have to be restricted to nine people (more the better, actually) though I think we should try to restrict it to those who have a pretty good handle on IJS: Easily can identify jumps and has a basic understanding of their technique Can identify the basic turns and steps, at least in slow-mo (because even I can't call the turns on the fly in a StSq in real time and must slow it down) Understands GOE, Level, and PCS criteria These aren't all inclusive though. Logistically, I think the easiest way would be for all the "judges" to send in their marks to one person who will compile it into a single protocol, either through PM or a Google sheet (I can coordinate this, I have a template set up). Marks won't be anonymous, of course. We will probably start with one of his CS or GP events since those have less skaters and are easier to handle. Lol Leave your thoughts and suggestions! If enough people are free in the coming days/week and we have a good number we can get started soon!

Will do!

That's good too. Even the GP events don't have many skaters. And US Classic? Lol I was thinking of only competitions that Yuzu is in. Haha. I don't care either way though.

We could start with a GPF since there are only 6 skaters there. Lol

For the people who are knowledgeable, would they be interested in setting up a mock judging panel? I'm always interested to see how fans score compared to reality, as well as compare my own scores. It doesn't have to be restricted to 9 judges (more participants the better!). We could even pick specific events to judge every month or something! This question may be suited for its own topic thread if the mods feel so...

Frankly, at this point, it is too late for Shoma and Nathan to significantly "fix" their techniques. I'm still mind-boggled at the GOE Shoma received in Helsinki. When I scored it I had him 10 points less than what he actually got!

I think it would be better if the banner said "2014 Olympic Champion" on one side, and then "2014 & 2017 World Champion" on the other side. Lol I think that looks more organized. It will have to be changed anyway when he wins Olympics next year.