Jump to content

swanbeau

Members
  • Content count

    564
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About swanbeau

  • Rank
    SEIMEI

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. swanbeau

    2018/19 GP Assignments

    korea refused and the finland fed only got asked a week ago?! Talk about short notice! o_O Can you imagine if no one actually wanted to host the cancelled coc? damn... this almost turned into a disaster orz not surprised that two olympic champions are going there
  2. swanbeau

    Proposed changes for next season

    There better be! It'll be interesting!
  3. swanbeau

    Proposed changes for next season

    We yuzu's 3F lover are gonna be so deprived But wouldnt 3Lz be more dangerous for him if he's still managing his injury at the start of next season? Is the chance of him learning lo3F really that low What if he does 3A3Lo tho
  4. swanbeau

    Proposed changes for next season

    Oh yeah at least now he gets consequences if he does that, thanks for reminding me
  5. swanbeau

    Proposed changes for next season

    Aah i see. this is why the vote shouldnt be a package thing like that, makes it even more confusing smh isu Holy crap nathan can still go with a 'only 4 type of jumps' layout even with this rule. i did not see this coming
  6. swanbeau

    Proposed changes for next season

    Any restriction on repeating quads has never been in usfa men skaters' favor (2 of them at least). I dont know why many seems to think so. Repeating 4Lz and/or 4F in combo and solo will always be a huge advantage. Nathan isnt really an edge jumper so.... This ruling doesnt really favor him. He'll probably just do 4 quads. Because falling while trying 4Lo again is a huge risk now, especially when he come into this season as a current world champion with a certain momentum and he is still trying to win the judges affection, or maybe you could say he already won them but he's still in the stage where he needs to maintain it. Or maybe he has the courage on not playing it safe like a certain someone, but i dont know, i kinda doubt that somehow.
  7. swanbeau

    Proposed changes for next season

    There was definitely something going on there. My preference is actually Bonus for six type jumpers, w no change in zayak like last season > 1 quad repetition > no quad repetition >>>> no change at all allowing skaters to potentially, hypothetically, jump only 4 type of them in the free with no consequences
  8. swanbeau

    Proposed changes for next season

    It is only effective if the repetition thing didn't pass. Hence why i thought it would be a good idea to combat it. But too bad that clearly the isu people prefer the no quad repetition rule. Its a good thing that they at least allow 1 quad repetition now. Maybe they reach a compromise? behind the scene
  9. swanbeau

    Proposed changes for next season

    It is withdrawn by japan.
  10. swanbeau

    Proposed changes for next season

    Sorry i just saw this but i wasnt talking about the backload proposal? In fact i hate that proposal as well. 1 jump bonus only in secondhalf sp is a monstrosity. I was talking about the 'reward skaters who jump ALL SIX types of them to promote variety' proposal. This proposal is under the backloading proposal in the original pdf document. This proposal is more straightforward in 'variety' and a way to combat the no repeat quad proposal, they even use the same 'variety' thing as a reason. Too bad it is withdrawn. Also, in the original document, the killing backloading thing is used to justify 'balance', not 'variety', i dont know what the heck happened that they bring up variety in the conference regarding killing backloading bc it makes no freaking sense at all. Maybe the person who propose it and the person who go to the conference as a representative has a mismatch view lol
  11. swanbeau

    Proposed changes for next season

    Im glad the zayak rule passed pheeww, AND this is better than not allowing a quad repetition at all, limiting to only one. I guess they reached a compromise behind the scene (maybe japan made this happen considering what they propose earlier lol but im still gonna miss that 'need to jump all six types' proposal bc it was better) But this also means that 3A will be more important than ever! Which is a good thing for me bc i love axel, but a nightmare for anybody who dont have stabilized 3A. What astonished me is they really dont care that we all know they negotiated behind the conference? What with passing that whole tech package stuff?
  12. swanbeau

    Proposed changes for next season

    You just blow my mind It really feels like what gets passed and what gets voted yes are already fixed, and we're the only one who dont know
  13. swanbeau

    Proposed changes for next season

    Since japan withdraw that 'reward skaters who jump all six type of jumps in free' they will most likely vote yes on the 'no quad repetition' rule bc its essentially a more evil version of what they want to propose, n serve the same purpose, kinda
  14. swanbeau

    Proposed changes for next season

    They dont need to place it at the end if they train a huge bv quad like 4lz n 4f, just land it beautifully n the goe will make up for the x1.1 bv. They just need to train two of the highest bv quad possible for them, and then repeat it in combo. Thats 4 already. The more you train only that, the more those jumps stabilize, the more you go clean on competition. The more you win? And then the rest, just jumps the same type of jumps in triple bc that will benefits you more. Avoid the type of jumps that you have difficulty on completely, dont even train it. If its two type of jumps then be it. You just need 3 type of jumps you need to /really/ excel at, two of those you need the quad version, and then pray you land the axel.
  15. swanbeau

    Proposed changes for next season

    Its complicated, this would be better definitely, but no one is proposing it right now for next season. The only one we have is that quad restriction rule... Which is simpler (no repeat of quad, thats it) :'(
×