I'm wondering too, now ! My old statistics/mathematical side can't actually handle that
I mean, I know you already know all of this but :
- PCS that could be judge be different juries (TR = one jury, SS = one jury, IN PE CO = one jury). TR could actually be measured in term of time/ratio, and the difficulty and quality would still be judge by judges. Perhaps put some level/points for entry/exit of jumps ?
- GOE : it's seems actually to function like the PCS (on a scale -5 to 5, -5 being extremely poor and 5 being outstanding) more than following the bullet (actually judges seems to follow the code when it's negative GOE, because ... whatever !). And use some IceScope stuff for the objective criteria (lenght, height etc ... compared to the height of the skaters).
- And of course, the tech panel that seems to disfunction now and then. Setting cameras and reviewing slo-mo from different angles, is it that hard ? And comparing it live with texbook jumps from ISU footage ?
Code question : is a full blade take-off penalised by GOE ? or is it only Edge problem that are penalised by GOE ?